Sea Ice

Description

Iceberg photo and satellite image of the ice floes.
Iceberg photo (top) and Landsat-7 satellite image of the Arctic ice pack (bottom). NASA credits, data from the Global Land Cover Facility.
Map of sea ice thickness over the Arctic Ocean measured by the Cryosat-2 altimeter
Sea ice thickness over the Arctic Ocean measured by the Cryosat-2 altimeter in March 2014. LEGOS/CTOH credits.

In the oceans, we differentiate sea ice (ice pack) formed from sea water (salt water) and icebergs, formed from inland waters (fresh water).

Sea ice forms when ocean water temperatures reach freezing point, about -1.8°C, depending on the salinity of the water. Sea ice grows both in size and thickness to form ice floes in late fall and winter. Multi-year ice, which does not melt from one season to the next, can reach a thickness of about 3 m.

This drifting ice sometimes collides, deforms and cracks. These cracked areas open up ice-free areas called leads and polynyas. Through these holes in the ice, which are darker in colour than the ice, or in other words, have a smaller albedo than on ice-covered areas, solar radiation reflects less. As a result, through these "holes" in the ice, the ocean absorbs more energy, which accelerates their warming. The melting of the ice pack does not bring water to the ocean and therefore does not contribute to the direct rise in its level. However, the increased melting of the ice increases the solar radiation absorbed at the ocean surface, which amplifies their warming.

Icebergs are formed from continental ice, which flows to the ocean as floating ice shelves. Blocks of ice break up (icebergs) from these platforms and leave the continent to drift with the currents and winds. The largest icebergs reaching up to several tens of kilometres can drift for several years on trajectories of several thousand kilometres.

Monitoring sea ice and melting continental ice are essential indicators for assessing the extent of climate change.

SKIM, satellite du futur pour mesurer les courants et les vagues

Satellites courant glace sea surface height vague

Satellite SKIM pour mesurer les courants, les vagues, la dérive des glaces et les hauteurs de mer

Le projet de mission SKIM vient d'être présélectionné par l'ESA pour un lancement à partir de 2025. Ses objectifs sont dédiés aux mesures des…

>
Saral/AltiKa satellite, CNES/ISRO
Artistic view of the Saral/AltiKa satellite whose inclined orbit allows the observation of high latitudes whose Ka band allows a better resolution. CNES credit.
[Translate to English:] Carte d'épaisseur de glace sur l'océan Arctique mesurée par l'altimètre de Cryosat-2 en mars 2014.
[Translate to English:] Epaisseur de glace de mer sur l'océan Arctique mesurée par l'altimètre de Cryosat-2 en mars 2014. Crédits LEGOS/CTOH.

Satellite measurements

The physical characteristics of sea ice and icebergs and their spatial and temporal variability are well described by spatial remote sensing, whether using imaging, altimeter or optical radar techniques.

A quick look at the satellite sensors behind the "ice" products in the ODATIS catalogue:

SAR imagery sensors, in C-band on the Sentinel-1 satellite for example, systematically map sea ice and are able to measure ice extent. The passive microwave sensors of the SSM/I and SSMIS radiometer are also used to calculate sea ice concentration.

Radar altimeters for satellite missions with a very steep orbit capable of reaching high latitudes (Envisat, Saral, Cryosat) determine the extent, thickness and volume of sea ice (corrected for snow depth at their surface). These sensors are also used to detect "holes" in the ice pack (polynyas, leads) and are able to follow the deformation dynamics of the ice pack. Altimeter radars are also used for iceberg detection, their monthly ice volume, the probability of icebergs being present and the average iceberg area.

The backscatter properties of scatterometers (AMI WIND on ERS satellites, ASCAT on METOP satellites for example) allow to monitor the extent and edges of sea ice (distinguishing open waters from sea ice), but also the age of sea ice.

Multimedia

  • Sea ice concentration and surface area in the Arctic Ocean in 2017 based on SSMI measurements processed by the CDS-SAT-CERSAT. The animation is also available with a higher resolution by downloading the file in ".avi" format.

Scientific publications

Sea ice

  • Frappart, F, Benoit Legresy, Fernando Niño, Fabien Blarel, Nicolas Fuller, Sara Fleury, Florence Birol, and S. Calmant. 2016. An ERS-2 Altimetry Reprocessing Compatible with ENVISAT for Long- Term Land and Ice Sheets Studies. Remote Sensing of Environment, no. 184: 558–81. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2016.07.037.
  • Girard-Ardhuin, F., and R. Ezraty, 2012 : Enhanced Arctic sea ice drift estimation merging radiometer and scatterometer data. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing, vol. 50, n. 7, pp 2639-2648. doi : 10.1109/TGRS.2012.2184124.
  • Guerreiro K., Fleury S., Zakharova E., Rémy F., Kouraev A., 2016. Potential for Estimation of Snow Depth on Arctic Sea Ice from CryoSat-2 and SARAL/AltiKa Missions. Remote Sensing of Environment 186 (December): 339–49. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2016.07.013.
  • Krumpen, T., M. Janout, K.I. Hodges, R. Gerdes, F. Girard-Ardhuin, J.A.H. Hölemann, S. Willmes, 2013 : Variability and trends in Laptev sea ice outflow between 1992-2011. The Cryosphere, vol. 7, pp 349-363. DOI : 10.5194/tcd-7-349-2013. 
  • Hippert A. 2016, Diminution du volume de la glace de mer de l’Océan Arctique : étude des incertitudes de mesures de l’épaisseur de glace liées à la neige, rapport de stage de fin d'études, pdf
  • Krumpen, T., M. Janout, K.I. Hodges, R. Gerdes,  F. Girard-Ardhuin, J.A.H. Hölemann, S. Willmes, 2013 : Variability and trends in Laptev sea ice outflow between 1992-2011. The Cryosphere, vol. 7, pp 349-363. doi : 10.5194/tcd-7-349-2013, (pdf)
  • Rozman, P., J. Hölemann, T. Krumpen, R. Gerdes, C. Köberle, T. Lavergne, S. Adams, F. Girard-Ardhuin, 2011 : Validating satellite derived and modeled sea ice drift in the Laptev sea with In Situ measurements of winter 2007/08. Polar Research, vol. 30 (7218). DOI : 10.3402/polar.v30i0.7218
  • Sumata, H., T. Lavergne, F. Girard-Ardhuin, N. Kimura, M.A. Tschudi, F. Kauker, M. Karcher, R. Gerdes, 2014 : An intercomparison of Arctic ice drift products to deduce uncertainties estimates, J. Geophys. Res., vol. 119, pp 4887-4921, doi: 10.1002/2013JC009724.
  • Télédétection satellitaire des surfaces enneigées et englacées, Télédétection satellitaire des surfaces enneigées et englacées, page web externe.
  • Zakharova E.A., Fleury S., Guerreiro K., Willmes S., Rémy R., Kouraev A ., Heinemann G., 2015. Sea iceleads detection using SARAL/AltiKa altimeter. Marine Geodesy, 38(S1), 522-533, doi 10.1080/01490419.2015.1019655

Icebergs

  • Merino Nacho M., Le Sommer J., Durand G., Jourdain N., Madec G., Mathiot P., Tournadre J., 2016, Antarctic icebergs melt over the Southern Ocean : climatology and impact on sea ice, Ocean Modelling, August 2016, Volume 104, Pages 99-110, DOI: 10.1016/j.ocemod.2016.05.001, pdf
  • Tournadre J., Accensi M., Girard-Ardhuin F., 2013, The ALTIBERG iceberg data base, Doc. Tech. LOS, pdf 
  • Tournadre, J. N. Bouhier, F. Girard-Ardhuin, F. Rémy, 2015 : Large icebergs caracteristics from altimeter waveforms analysis. Journal of Geophys. Res., vol 120, pp 1954-1974. DOI : 10.1002/2014JC010502.
  • Tournadre, J., N. Bouhier, F. Girard-Ardhuin, F. Rémy, 2016: Antarctic icebergs distributions 1992-2014. Journal of Geophys. Res., vol 121, pp 327-349. DOI : 10.1002/2015JC011178

Data access

Centre de Données et Services

© Odatis 2024   - Tous droits réservés